共享資源:管理员
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

此页解释了管理员(有时叫做admins或者sysops)在维基共享资源上的职责。请注意,此职务的的细节,以及授予管理员权限的方式,可能与其他项目不同。
如果你需要管理员的帮助,请移步管理员公告板。
现时在维基共享资源上有174 名管理员。
什么是管理员?
| Administrators as of 2月 2026 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 174
If 174 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
技术
技术上,管理员在维基共享资源上有以下权限:
- 删除和还原图像及其他上传的文件,并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
- 删除和还原页面,并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
- 保护页面和解除对页面的保护,并可编辑保护级别为“仅允许管理员”的页面。
- 封禁和解封用户,进行IP地址(或IP段)的封禁。
- 編輯沒有太多限制的的界面訊息(參見界面管理員)
- 重命名文件。
- 添加和删除用户组。
- 配置上载向导。
- 彻底删除和还原特定页面的日志和历史版本。
- 从其他项目导入页面。
- 合并页面历史。
- 修改防滥用过滤器。
- 移动页面时不创建来源页面的重定向。
- 无视欺诈检查。
- 一次将一条消息发送给多个用户。(群发消息)
- 在API查询中使用更高的上限。
这些统称为管理工具。
社群角色
管理員是維基共享資源社群內有經驗的可信用戶,負責進階維護工作並且經公眾討論或投票已獲授權使用管理工具。不同的管理員有著不同的興趣和專長,但典型的管理員任務包括決策並關閉刪除請求、刪除版權違規、必要時恢復檔案、反破壞保護維基共享資源以及在模板和其他受保護頁面上作業。當然,其中有些工作也可以由非管理員完成。
管理員被期望瞭解是項目的目標,並準備著與其餘有志人士一同做出建設性的貢獻。管理員理應瞭解並遵守指引政策,在合理時尊重社群共識。
除去需要使用管理工具的時候,管理員由於個人立場不同並無特殊編輯權限,在討論或公開投票內,他們的貢獻被看作與其餘任一普通編者相同。一些管理員可能會變得更有影響力,這不是因為他們的管理員地位,而是因為他們從社群中獲得了對其個人的信任。
對管理員的建議
請詳閱管理員手冊。
移除管理员权限
根据管理员离任方针,如果管理员不活跃或者滥用管理工具,权限会被解除。 在管理员解任请求中,不适用参选管理员时判断共识的标准。而应当是使用“多数共识”,即超过50%的用户达成解任共识即可解任管理员。
申請成為管理員
所有有意願成為管理員的使用者必須經過這個過程,自薦至申請成為管理人員,包括那些想重新上任的前任管理員。
首先,前往Commons:Administrators/Howto並閱讀那裏的資訊。隨後返回並在下方的段落遞交申請。
- 點擊正確的按鈕並建立子頁面後,複製鏈接到子頁面。例如,"Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", 將 Commons:Administrators/Requests 粘貼到文段最頂部, 然後用兩個括弧包围起來 (例如 {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} )以嵌入。可以在MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice上申请一个全站监视列表通知,或者如果你是管理员,可以编辑MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice张贴通知。
- 如果他人提名閣下,請以陳述「我同意(I accept)」或是其餘類似字樣來接受,並在提名下方簽名。子頁面仍然需要被您或是您的提名人嵌入。
| 使用下方的方框,並將"Username"替換成您的用戶名。 |
投票
任一註冊用戶都可以在這投票,不过那些很少甚至沒有編輯過的人的票可能不會被計算在內。閣下最好在
Support或
Oppose時都給予理由,這能幫助行政員更好地做出决策。有支持理據的論證會比簡單的投票更被看重。
上任管理员通常需要75%的支持率,并至少需要有8人同意。来自未注册用户的投票将不被计入。不管怎样,关闭个案的行政员可以自行考虑社群共识,最终决定并不只基于原始数据。如果行政员认为需要更好地确定社区共识,可以酌情延长投票的时间。
由于需计算成功或失败率,
Neutral投票将不被计入投票总数。然而,这些评论是讨论的一部分,并可能会说服其他人,还有助于关闭个案的行政员更好地了解社群共识。
清除缓存使用下方的编辑链接来编辑嵌入后的页面。
申请成为管理员
完成后,此处列出的页面应归档至Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive。
- 在此投票前请阅读Commons:Administrators。任何登录用户均可投票,但编辑记录较少或无编辑记录的用户所投票数可能不会被完全计入。
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a unsuccessful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
This request ended on 3 February.--RoyZuo (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Taylor_49 (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · deleted uploads · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 00:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Having ca 20'000 edits at commons during past 9 years, most of them during last 2 years, I would like to help with the numberous backlogs of this wiki, among others ca 7'000 open requests for deletion, and ca 4000 category discussion requests. While some requests for deletion are extremely difficult, many are trivial and can be resolved by deletion after 7 days or even earlier due to obvious copyright violation or request of the uploader. Also many category discussion requests are trivial and need a speedy deletion only (example). I have been so far closing some deletion requests even without sysop status, limited to cases of obvious KEPT. meta.toolforge.org (very slow) While there are ca 170 human sysops on this wiki, of them ca 120 active ones, probably at least 40 more would be needed to stop the backlogs for further growing, and make them sink to a sane level, and I would like to be the first of 40 sysops appointed during th year 2026. Thank you. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Votes
Oppose per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots', incivility below, and the other opposes below. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose mainly due to the false accusation below and not seeing how the given comment parts were "comments about the matter". --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below discussion. --Bedivere (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The below discussion contains a false accusation of edit warring, together with some other (possibly true) accusations of "lack of illegitimate sockpuppets", "only claims en-3" and similar stuff. And that fine discussion was started by a fine problem user blocked on several wikis, probably frustrated over the miserable failure of eir own RFA some time ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- so your manner to respond to questions and issues is by making up fallacies? Bedivere (talk) 02:06, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose. — ArtSmir (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Would you also ask in case of a Pro vote? How ever - please stop commenting other peoples votes in such a manner. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- @L. Beck: read the above comment by Marcus Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree Lukas Beck (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- I will
Abstain Incall talk 04:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC) - Neutral: better luck next time. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but I don't think the candidate is quite ready for the admin role as evidenced by the comments preceding this one, and the noticeboard discussion. Wolverine X-eye 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment There is no noticeboard discussion about me. Just a complaint (possibly false) that nobody has ever answered to. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per discussion below. Nothing seems to be going your way. Shaan SenguptaTalk 06:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)- Avoding the answers like Bedivere points out… doesn't give me much confidence. — regards, Revi 07:12, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below. Nemoralis (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral because I don't want to pile on. Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- This RFA should probably be closed via Com:Snowball. Geoffroi 01:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Bad answer to Herby's questions. You confessed, that your userpage is not very accurate, but did not improve it. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment No major errors have been pointed. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment Please reveal what the "correct answer" would have been (after ca 10 "oppose" votes have already arrived) so that I can at least learn from my faults. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Your userpage states, that you are indefinitely blocked in eo.wiktionary. You were unblocked there more than 5 years ago. Correct would be to update your userpage. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Taivo! Herby talk thyme 10:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per the "miserable failure" comment above (in re. Bedivere's comment). This sort of petty sniping is entirely unbecoming of a prospective admin. Omphalographer (talk) 00:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Multiple blocks [1], regardless of when they happened, are not a relic, they're a serious concern for an admin candidate. Being combative, taking no responsibility for their actions, and shifting blame to others are further serious concerns. This user's complete refusal to address these concerns makes it very clear that they wouldn't make a good admin. Geoffroi 01:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- oh come on man.. i got multiple blocks too :(.. lets engage in commons contributions.... modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Support for motivation, hope you see your errors. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral i've not had bad impression of this user prior to this request.--RoyZuo (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. HurricaneZeta (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral While the candidate's active role in community maintenance is a positive, the discussion below reveals a failure to manage the conflict with others effectively. --0x0a (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Support: saw Jeff G's oppose; a reasonable behavioural report would have certainly garnered attention (which the one he provided didn't garner) and the TA incited a very reasonable response (response to diff) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
- how about Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots'? good luck. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 03:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Modern primat: I've replaced the URL with discussion link since the link did not take me directly to the thread. This way it does. Feel free to revert if you think otherwise or if this doesn't work for you. Shaan SenguptaTalk 09:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- I did never do a personal attack or anything close to it and I see absolutely no reason to do so and am very aware that doing so is very problematic which is why I never do so. Will oppose based on this false accusation. And screenshots are not videos as a matter of fact and the thing you quoted is not an insult and was not intended to be anything of that sort; I was just confused why anybody would categorize a screenshot like that and then revert my correction so I added a little clarification that things should not be categorized in ways that are false, whatever the reasons for doing so are. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Acknowledging the ping, really nothing to say that I didn't say on the (2 removes) linked thread. - Jmabel ! talk 20:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The user page User:Taylor 49 only claims en-3. Glrx (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oops, I misunderstood. 0x0a (talk) 12:01, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Colour me puzzled but why does your user page appear to suggest that you are "permanently blocked" on eo Wiktionary when your global account doesn't seem to bear that out? Herby talk thyme 15:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- @User:Herbythyme Thank you for that question. This is a relict from 6 years ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- Lower on the page, where they list "socks", it says, under "illegitimate", "none found so far". In their table of blocks, next to sv.wiki, it says "not yet". This is some very bizarre stuff to go along with the eo.wiktionary detail. Geoffroi 01:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Who the hell are you? I cannot find a single useful contribution of you at this wiki or any other wiki. Why did you post this comment? Are you maybe one of the registered users who commented and voted here, and deliberately logged out for the purpose of making this silly comment under the protection of those recently activated temporary accounts? Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Do you have any pronouns you would like to share? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Note, the candidate chose to answer on my user talk page in Special:Diff/1159437397, rather than here. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Geoffroi. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:53, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
申请成为行政员
完成后,此处列出的网页应归档至Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive。
- 在这里发表文章或投票之前,请阅读Commons:Bureaucrats。任何已登录的用户均可投票,但以前编辑次数较少或没有编辑过的用户可能不会被完全计算在内。
No current requests.
申请成为用户查核员
完成后,此处列出的页面应归档到Commons:Checkusers/Archive。
- 在这里发表文章或投票之前,请阅读Commons:Checkusers。任何已登录的用户均可投票,但以前编辑次数较少或没有编辑过的用户可能不会被完全计算在内。
No current requests.
申请成为监督员
完成后,此处列出的页面应归档到Commons:Checkusers/Archive。
- 在此投票前请阅读Commons:Oversighters。任何登录用户均可投票,但编辑记录较少或无编辑记录的用户所投票数可能不会被完全计入。
No current requests.
任務