Dadweynaha: Saraakiisha
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Boggani wuxuu sharxayaa doorka maamulayaasha (mararka qaarkood loo yaqaan adminssysops) ee Wikimedia Commons Ogow in tafaasiisha doorka iyo habka maamulayaasha loo magacaabay ay ka duwanaan karaan goobaha kale.
"Haddii aad jeclaan lahayd inaad codsato caawimada maamulka, fadlan ku dheji Guddiga Wararka Maamulka.
Hadda waxa jira 174 admin
Maxaa ka masuul ah? ==
| Administrators as of Febraayo 2026 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 174
If 174 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Farsamo =
Maamulayaashu waa isticmaalayaasha Wikimedia Commons kuwaas oo leh awood farsamo oo ay ku sameeyaan waxa soo socda:
- Tirtir oo tirtir sawirada la shubay iyo faylalka kale arag oo soo celi noocyada la tirtiray
- Tirtir oo tirtir boggaga arag oo soo celi noocyada la tirtiray.
- Wax ka beddel farriimaha is dhex galka xaddidaad yar eeg sidoo kale Commons:Interface Offices
- Magaca beddelo faylasha
- ku dar oo ka saar kooxaha isticmaalaha
- Habee ololayaasha soo dejinta
- Tirtir oo ka saar qoraalada taariikhda iyo noocyada boggaga wax laga beddelay
- Ka soo deji boggaga wikiyada kale
- Isku dhafka taariikhda bogga
- Wax ka beddel filtarrada xadgudubka
- Ha ka dhalin dib u habeyn boggaga isha marka aad guurayso boggaga
- Ka gudub jeegaga xajinta iyo ciwaanka ama liiska madow ee isticmaale
- Fariin u dir isticmaaleyaal badan hal mar (farriin)
- Adeegso xad sare ee su aalaha API
Qalabkan waxaa si wada jir ah loogu yaqaannaa aaladaha maamulka.
Doorka bulshada =
Maamulayaashu waa xubno khibrad leh oo la aamini karo oo ka tirsan bulshada Commons kuwaas oo qaata dayactir dheeraad ah waxaana lagu aaminay agabka maaraynta iyadoo la raacayo heshiis/cod dadweyne Maamulayaasha kala duwani way ku kala duwan yihiin meelaha ay xiiseeyaan iyo khibradahooda laakiin hawlaha maamulka ee caadiga ah waxaa ka mid ah aqoonsiga iyo xidhitaanka codsiyada tirtirka, tirtirida xadgudubyada xuquuqda daabacaada tirtirida faylasha marka loo baahdo ka ilaalinta Commons kharribaadda iyo ka shaqaynta qaabdhismeedka iyo boggaga kale ee la ilaaliyo Dabcan kuwa aan maamulka ahayn ayaa sidoo kale qaban kara qaar ka mid ah hawlahan.
Maamulayaasha waxa laga filayaa inay fahmaan goals mashruucan oo ay u diyaar garoobaan inay si wax dhis leh ula shaqeeyaan kuwa kale si loo gaadho yoolalkan Maamulayaashu waa inay sidoo kale fahmaan oo raacaan Commons:Policy and Guides
Marka laga reebo doorarka u baahan adeegsiga agabka maaraynta dhexdhexaadiyeyaashu ma laha awood tafatir oo gaar ah oo hore oo xafiiseed doodaha dadweynaha iyo cod bixinta waxa ay ku darsanayaan waxaa loola dhaqmaa si la mid ah tifaftirayaasha caadiga ah Dhexdhexaadiyeyaasha qaarkood ayaa laga yaabaa inay noqdaan kuwo saameyn badan leh ma aha sababtoo ah jagada laakiin kalsoonida shakhsi ahaaneed ee laga yaabo inay ka helaan bulshada.
Talo soo jeedin ku socota maamulayaasha
Fadlan akhri Commons:Hagaha Maamulka.
Xuquuqda maamulka ka saar
Sida hoos timaada siyaasada de-admin xuquuqaha maamulka waa lagala noqon karaa dhaqdhaqaaq la aanta ama si xun u isticmaalka qalabka sysop. Gudaha RFP shuruudaha caadiga ah ee lagu go aaminayo la isku raacsan yahay ee RFP kuma jiraan Taa baddalkeeda " isku raacsanaanta aqlabiyadda waa in la isticmaalo" halkaasoo heshiis kasta oo hoos u dhigista ka sarreeya 50% uu ku filan yahay in meesha laga saaro maamulka.
Codso si aad u noqoto maamule
Dhammaan maamulayaasha mustaqbalka waa in ay maraan nidaamkan oo ay isbartaan RFA oo ay ku jiraan dhammaan maamulayaashii hore ee doonaya in ay ku soo laabtaan doorkoodii hore.
Marka hore aad Commons:Administrators/Howto oo akhri macluumaadka halkaas Kadib ku soo noqo halkan oo ku soo gudbi codsigaaga qaybta hoose.
- Kadib markaad gujiso badhanka ku habboon oo aad samaysato bogga-hoosaadka koobiyayso xidhiidhka bogga-hoosaadka sida "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username" dabadeed tafatir Commons:Administrators/Requests oo ku dheji dusha sare ee qaybta ka dibna ku dheji dhejisyada qaloocan (tusaale {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) transclude Ka codso ogeysiinta liiska daawashada MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice ama wax ka beddel MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice si aad ogeysiis u geliso haddii aad tahay maamule.
- Haddii uu qof kale kuu magacaabo fadlan aqbal magacaabista adiga oo sheegaya "Waan oggolahay" ama wax la mid ah saxiixna hoosta magacaabista lafteeda Adiga ama qofka ku magacaabay waa inaad wali ku dartaa bogga hoose.
| Isticmaal sanduuqa hoose, oo ku beddel magaca isticmaalaha "username": |
Cod
Isticmaale kasta oo diiwaangashan ayaa ka codayn kara halkan in kasta oo kuwa wax yar ama tafatir hore aan si buuxda loo tirin karin Way fiicantahay in la bixiyo sababaha kor iyo hoosba sababtoo ah tani waxay ka caawin doontaa xafiiska xidhitaanka go aankiisa Miisaan dheeri ah ayaa la siinayaa doodda iyadoo leh cadaymo taageeraya haddii loo baahdo halkii cod fudud laga siin lahaa.
Dallacaadda ayaa caadiyan u baahan ugu yaraan 75% oggolaansho oo leh ugu yaraan 8 cod Codadka isticmaalayaasha aan diiwaangashanayn lama tiriyo Si kastaba ha ahaatee codsiyada xidhitaanka xafiiska xafiisku wuxuu leeyahay go aan uu ku xukumo is afgaradka bulshada go aankuna qasab maaha inuu ku salaysnaado tirooyin cayriin ah Bureaucrats waxa laga yaabaa, markay go aankooda kordhiyaan muddada RFA haddii ay dareemaan in samaynta sidaas ay waxtar u leedahay go aaminta is-afgaradka bulshada.
Faallooyinka dhexdhexaadka ah laguma tiriyo wadarta codadka ujeeddooyinka xisaabinta boqolleyda gudubka/fashilka Si kastaba ha ahaatee faallooyinka noocan ahi waxay qayb ka yihiin doodda laga yaabaa inay qanciyaan kuwa kale oo ay gacan ka geystaan fahamka kama dambaysta ah ee xafiiska xafiiska ee is afgaradka bulshada.
clear cache Isticmaal xidhiidhka wax ka beddelka ee hoose si aad wax uga beddesho bogga ku lifaaqan.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a unsuccessful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
This request ended on 3 February.--RoyZuo (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Taylor_49 (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · deleted uploads · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 00:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Having ca 20'000 edits at commons during past 9 years, most of them during last 2 years, I would like to help with the numberous backlogs of this wiki, among others ca 7'000 open requests for deletion, and ca 4000 category discussion requests. While some requests for deletion are extremely difficult, many are trivial and can be resolved by deletion after 7 days or even earlier due to obvious copyright violation or request of the uploader. Also many category discussion requests are trivial and need a speedy deletion only (example). I have been so far closing some deletion requests even without sysop status, limited to cases of obvious KEPT. meta.toolforge.org (very slow) While there are ca 170 human sysops on this wiki, of them ca 120 active ones, probably at least 40 more would be needed to stop the backlogs for further growing, and make them sink to a sane level, and I would like to be the first of 40 sysops appointed during th year 2026. Thank you. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Votes
Oppose per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots', incivility below, and the other opposes below. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose mainly due to the false accusation below and not seeing how the given comment parts were "comments about the matter". --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below discussion. --Bedivere (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The below discussion contains a false accusation of edit warring, together with some other (possibly true) accusations of "lack of illegitimate sockpuppets", "only claims en-3" and similar stuff. And that fine discussion was started by a fine problem user blocked on several wikis, probably frustrated over the miserable failure of eir own RFA some time ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- so your manner to respond to questions and issues is by making up fallacies? Bedivere (talk) 02:06, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose. — ArtSmir (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Would you also ask in case of a Pro vote? How ever - please stop commenting other peoples votes in such a manner. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- @L. Beck: read the above comment by Marcus Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree Lukas Beck (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- I will
Abstain Incall talk 04:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC) - Neutral: better luck next time. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but I don't think the candidate is quite ready for the admin role as evidenced by the comments preceding this one, and the noticeboard discussion. Wolverine X-eye 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment There is no noticeboard discussion about me. Just a complaint (possibly false) that nobody has ever answered to. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per discussion below. Nothing seems to be going your way. Shaan SenguptaTalk 06:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)- Avoding the answers like Bedivere points out… doesn't give me much confidence. — regards, Revi 07:12, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below. Nemoralis (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral because I don't want to pile on. Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- This RFA should probably be closed via Com:Snowball. Geoffroi 01:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Bad answer to Herby's questions. You confessed, that your userpage is not very accurate, but did not improve it. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment No major errors have been pointed. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment Please reveal what the "correct answer" would have been (after ca 10 "oppose" votes have already arrived) so that I can at least learn from my faults. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Your userpage states, that you are indefinitely blocked in eo.wiktionary. You were unblocked there more than 5 years ago. Correct would be to update your userpage. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Taivo! Herby talk thyme 10:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per the "miserable failure" comment above (in re. Bedivere's comment). This sort of petty sniping is entirely unbecoming of a prospective admin. Omphalographer (talk) 00:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Multiple blocks [1], regardless of when they happened, are not a relic, they're a serious concern for an admin candidate. Being combative, taking no responsibility for their actions, and shifting blame to others are further serious concerns. This user's complete refusal to address these concerns makes it very clear that they wouldn't make a good admin. Geoffroi 01:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- oh come on man.. i got multiple blocks too :(.. lets engage in commons contributions.... modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Support for motivation, hope you see your errors. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral i've not had bad impression of this user prior to this request.--RoyZuo (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. HurricaneZeta (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral While the candidate's active role in community maintenance is a positive, the discussion below reveals a failure to manage the conflict with others effectively. --0x0a (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Support: saw Jeff G's oppose; a reasonable behavioural report would have certainly garnered attention (which the one he provided didn't garner) and the TA incited a very reasonable response (response to diff) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
- how about Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots'? good luck. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 03:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Modern primat: I've replaced the URL with discussion link since the link did not take me directly to the thread. This way it does. Feel free to revert if you think otherwise or if this doesn't work for you. Shaan SenguptaTalk 09:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- I did never do a personal attack or anything close to it and I see absolutely no reason to do so and am very aware that doing so is very problematic which is why I never do so. Will oppose based on this false accusation. And screenshots are not videos as a matter of fact and the thing you quoted is not an insult and was not intended to be anything of that sort; I was just confused why anybody would categorize a screenshot like that and then revert my correction so I added a little clarification that things should not be categorized in ways that are false, whatever the reasons for doing so are. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Acknowledging the ping, really nothing to say that I didn't say on the (2 removes) linked thread. - Jmabel ! talk 20:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The user page User:Taylor 49 only claims en-3. Glrx (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oops, I misunderstood. 0x0a (talk) 12:01, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Colour me puzzled but why does your user page appear to suggest that you are "permanently blocked" on eo Wiktionary when your global account doesn't seem to bear that out? Herby talk thyme 15:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- @User:Herbythyme Thank you for that question. This is a relict from 6 years ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- Lower on the page, where they list "socks", it says, under "illegitimate", "none found so far". In their table of blocks, next to sv.wiki, it says "not yet". This is some very bizarre stuff to go along with the eo.wiktionary detail. Geoffroi 01:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Who the hell are you? I cannot find a single useful contribution of you at this wiki or any other wiki. Why did you post this comment? Are you maybe one of the registered users who commented and voted here, and deliberately logged out for the purpose of making this silly comment under the protection of those recently activated temporary accounts? Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Do you have any pronouns you would like to share? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Note, the candidate chose to answer on my user talk page in Special:Diff/1159437397, rather than here. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Geoffroi. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:53, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Tasks