Commons:Administrateurs
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Cette page explique le rôle des administrateurs (parfois appelés admins ou sysops) sur Wikimedia Commons. Veuillez noter que les détails concernant ce statut, et la façon dont les administrateurs sont nommés, peut être différente des autres sites.
Si vous avez besoin de l'aide d'un administrateur, veuillez poster un message sur la page Requêtes aux administrateurs.
Il y a actuellement 174 administrateurs sur Commons.
Qu'est-ce qu'est un administrateur?
| Administrators as of février 2026 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 174
If 174 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Rôle technique
Les administrateurs sont des utilisateurs ayant la possibilité technique de :
- supprimer / restaurer des images et d'autres fichiers téléversés et restaurer des versions supprimées
- supprimer / restaurer des pages et visualiser / restaurer des versions supprimées
- protéger / déprotéger des pages et modifier des pages protégées
- bloquer / débloquer des utilisateurs, des adresses IP individuelles ou des plages d'adresses IP
- modifier certains messages de l'interface (voir aussi Commons:Administrateurs d'interface)
- renommer les fichiers
- ajouter et supprimer des groupes d'utilisateurs
- configurer l'assistant d'Upload
- supprimer / restaurer des entrées de journal spécifiques et des révisions de pages
- importer des pages à partir d'autres wikis
- fusionner l'historique de pages
- modifier les filtres anti-abus
- ne pas créer de redirection depuis la page d'origine lors du renommage de pages
- passer outre les contrôles de spoofing et la liste noire des titres et noms d'utilisateurs
- envoyer un message à plusieurs utilisateurs à la fois (massmessage)
- Disposer de limites plus élevées lors de l'utilisation de requêtes API
Tous ces éléments sont connus sous le nom d'outils de l'administrateur.
Rôle communautaire
Les administrateurs sont des membres expérimentés et fiables de la communauté, qui se chargent d'un travail d'entretien en sus de leurs activités en tant qu'éditeurs, et qui ont obtenu pour cela les outils d'administrateurs moyennant un consensus/vote public. Chaque administrateur a ses centres d'intérêt et son expérience donnée, mais les tâches typiques qu'ils réalisent incluent notamment de traiter et clôturer les demandes de suppression de fichiers, de supprimer les fichiers violant les droits d'auteur, de restaurer des fichiers lorsque c'est nécessaire, de protéger Commons contre le vandalisme, et de travailler sur les modèles et autres pages protégées. Bien sûr, quelques-unes de ces tâches peuvent également être effectuées par d'autres utilisateurs.
Les administrateurs doivent comprendre les objectifs de ce projet et être prêts à travailler de manière constructive avec les autres dans ce but. Les administrateurs doivent également comprendre et respecter les règles et recommandations de Commons et, le cas échéant, respecter le consensus de la communauté.
Mis à part les tâches qui nécessitent l'usage de leurs outils propres, les administrateurs n'ont pas d'autorité particulière en matière éditoriale du fait de leur statut. Leurs contributions ont la même valeur que celles de tout autre contributeur. Bien-sûr, quelques administrateurs sont influents ; cela ne vient pas de leur position d'administrateur, mais de la confiance qu'ils ont acquise auprès de la communauté.
Conseils pour les administrateurs
Merci de lire le guide de l'administrateur.
Retrait des droits d'administrateur
Selon les règles de révocation des administrateurs, les droits d'administrateur peuvent être retirés en cas d'inactivité ou de mauvaise utilisation des outils d'administration. Lors d'une demande de retrait des droits d'administrateur, les règles normalement applicables pour déterminer un consensus dans une demande de droits administrateur ne s'appliquent pas. Au lieu de cela, il faudrait utiliser un « consensus majoritaire », par lequel tout consensus en faveur d'un retrait des droits de plus de 50% est suffisant pour valider le retrait des droits d'administrateur.
Comment devenir administrateur ?
Tous les candidats au rôle d'administrateur doivent passer par cette étape et soumettre leur demande à la communauté via une RFA, y compris les anciens administrateurs qui souhaiteraient retrouver leur rôle.
Tout d'abord, allez à Commons:Administrators/Howto et lisez les informations qui s'y trouvent. Revenez ensuite ici et faites votre demande dans la section ci-dessous.
- Après avoir cliqué sur le bouton approprié et créé la sous-page, copiez le lien vers cette sous-page (par exemple « Commons:Administrators/Requests/Votrenomd'utilisateur »), éditez la page Commons:Administrators/Requests et collez le lien en haut de la section. Ensuite, placez-le entre deux doubles accolades pour le . Faites une demande de notification de liste de suivi sur MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, ou modifiez MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice pour ajouter une demande si vous êtes administrateur.
- Si quelqu'un d'autre a proposé votre candidature, merci de signaler si vous l'acceptez en indiquant « J'accepte. » ou quelque-chose de similaire, et de signer vous-même au bas de la candidature. La sous-page aura encore besoin d'être transcluse par vous ou le proposant.
| Utilisez la boîte ci-dessous ; remplacez « Username » par votre nom d'utilisateur. |
Voter
N'importe quel utilisateur enregistré peut voter ici, mais leur vote pourrait ne pas être pleinement pris en compte s'ils n'ont à leur actif que peu ou pas d'édition. Il est préférable donner les raisons pour lesquelles vous votez « pour » ou « contre » afin d'aider le bureaucrate qui doit fermer la nomination à prendre une décision informée. Un vote argumenté possède un plus grand poids qu'un vote simple, et ce d'autant plus s'il apporte des éléments matériels pour appuyer son argumentation.
Le statut d'administrateur est accordé à partir de 75 % des voix et un minimum de 8 votes de soutien. Les votes d'utilisateurs non enregistrés ne sont pas comptabilisées. Toutefois, le bureaucrate clôturant le vote dispose d'un pouvoir discrétionnaire ; sa décision ne sera pas forcément basée sur les résultats bruts. Les bureaucrates peuvent, à leur discrétion, prolonger la période d'une demande de droits d'administrateur s'ils pensent que cela peut aider à obtenir un meilleur consensus de la communauté.
Les votes
Neutral ne sont pas décomptés. Pour autant, ils alimentent les discussions, peuvent servir à convaincre les votants, et apportent des éléments de compréhension de la position de la communauté aux bureaucrates qui clôtureront le vote.
Purge the cache Utiliser ce lien pour purger le cache de la page.
Candidatures au statut d'administrateur
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Administrateurs avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a unsuccessful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
This request ended on 3 February.--RoyZuo (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Taylor_49 (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · deleted uploads · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 00:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Having ca 20'000 edits at commons during past 9 years, most of them during last 2 years, I would like to help with the numberous backlogs of this wiki, among others ca 7'000 open requests for deletion, and ca 4000 category discussion requests. While some requests for deletion are extremely difficult, many are trivial and can be resolved by deletion after 7 days or even earlier due to obvious copyright violation or request of the uploader. Also many category discussion requests are trivial and need a speedy deletion only (example). I have been so far closing some deletion requests even without sysop status, limited to cases of obvious KEPT. meta.toolforge.org (very slow) While there are ca 170 human sysops on this wiki, of them ca 120 active ones, probably at least 40 more would be needed to stop the backlogs for further growing, and make them sink to a sane level, and I would like to be the first of 40 sysops appointed during th year 2026. Thank you. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Votes
Oppose per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots', incivility below, and the other opposes below. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose mainly due to the false accusation below and not seeing how the given comment parts were "comments about the matter". --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below discussion. --Bedivere (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The below discussion contains a false accusation of edit warring, together with some other (possibly true) accusations of "lack of illegitimate sockpuppets", "only claims en-3" and similar stuff. And that fine discussion was started by a fine problem user blocked on several wikis, probably frustrated over the miserable failure of eir own RFA some time ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- so your manner to respond to questions and issues is by making up fallacies? Bedivere (talk) 02:06, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose. — ArtSmir (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Would you also ask in case of a Pro vote? How ever - please stop commenting other peoples votes in such a manner. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- @L. Beck : read the above comment by Marcus Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree Lukas Beck (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- I will
Abstain Incall talk 04:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC) - Neutral: better luck next time. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but I don't think the candidate is quite ready for the admin role as evidenced by the comments preceding this one, and the noticeboard discussion. Wolverine X-eye 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment There is no noticeboard discussion about me. Just a complaint (possibly false) that nobody has ever answered to. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per discussion below. Nothing seems to be going your way. Shaan SenguptaTalk 06:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)- Avoding the answers like Bedivere points out… doesn't give me much confidence. — regards, Revi 07:12, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below. Nemoralis (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral because I don't want to pile on. Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- This RFA should probably be closed via Com:Snowball. Geoffroi 01:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Bad answer to Herby's questions. You confessed, that your userpage is not very accurate, but did not improve it. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment No major errors have been pointed. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment Please reveal what the "correct answer" would have been (after ca 10 "oppose" votes have already arrived) so that I can at least learn from my faults. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Your userpage states, that you are indefinitely blocked in eo.wiktionary. You were unblocked there more than 5 years ago. Correct would be to update your userpage. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Taivo! Herby talk thyme 10:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per the "miserable failure" comment above (in re. Bedivere's comment). This sort of petty sniping is entirely unbecoming of a prospective admin. Omphalographer (talk) 00:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Multiple blocks [1], regardless of when they happened, are not a relic, they're a serious concern for an admin candidate. Being combative, taking no responsibility for their actions, and shifting blame to others are further serious concerns. This user's complete refusal to address these concerns makes it very clear that they wouldn't make a good admin. Geoffroi 01:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- oh come on man.. i got multiple blocks too :(.. lets engage in commons contributions.... modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Support for motivation, hope you see your errors. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral i've not had bad impression of this user prior to this request.--RoyZuo (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. HurricaneZeta (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral While the candidate's active role in community maintenance is a positive, the discussion below reveals a failure to manage the conflict with others effectively. --0x0a (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Support: saw Jeff G's oppose; a reasonable behavioural report would have certainly garnered attention (which the one he provided didn't garner) and the TA incited a very reasonable response (response to diff) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
- how about Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots'? good luck. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 03:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Modern primat : I've replaced the URL with discussion link since the link did not take me directly to the thread. This way it does. Feel free to revert if you think otherwise or if this doesn't work for you. Shaan SenguptaTalk 09:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- I did never do a personal attack or anything close to it and I see absolutely no reason to do so and am very aware that doing so is very problematic which is why I never do so. Will oppose based on this false accusation. And screenshots are not videos as a matter of fact and the thing you quoted is not an insult and was not intended to be anything of that sort; I was just confused why anybody would categorize a screenshot like that and then revert my correction so I added a little clarification that things should not be categorized in ways that are false, whatever the reasons for doing so are. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Acknowledging the ping, really nothing to say that I didn't say on the (2 removes) linked thread. - Jmabel ! talk 20:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The user page User:Taylor 49 only claims en-3. Glrx (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oops, I misunderstood. 0x0a (talk) 12:01, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Colour me puzzled but why does your user page appear to suggest that you are "permanently blocked" on eo Wiktionary when your global account doesn't seem to bear that out? Herby talk thyme 15:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- @User:Herbythyme Thank you for that question. This is a relict from 6 years ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- Lower on the page, where they list "socks", it says, under "illegitimate", "none found so far". In their table of blocks, next to sv.wiki, it says "not yet". This is some very bizarre stuff to go along with the eo.wiktionary detail. Geoffroi 01:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Who the hell are you? I cannot find a single useful contribution of you at this wiki or any other wiki. Why did you post this comment? Are you maybe one of the registered users who commented and voted here, and deliberately logged out for the purpose of making this silly comment under the protection of those recently activated temporary accounts? Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Do you have any pronouns you would like to share? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Note, the candidate chose to answer on my user talk page in Special:Diff/1159437397, rather than here. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Geoffroi. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:53, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Candidatures au statut de bureaucrate
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Bureaucrates avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
No current requests.
Demandes des droits de vérificateur d'adresse IP
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Vérificateurs d'adresses IP avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
No current requests.
Demandes du droit technique "masqueur de modifications"
Une fois traitées, les pages listées ici devraient être archivées sur Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Veuillez lire la page Commons:Masqueurs de modifications avant de voter ici. Tout utilisateur connecté peut voter, bien que ceux qui n'ont pas ou peu de contributions à leur actif à la date du vote peuvent voir leur vote non ou partiellement comptabilisé.
No current requests.
Tâches