Commons:Administratoren
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Diese Seite erklärt die Rolle von Administratoren (manchmal auch Admins bzw. Sysops) auf Wikimedia Commons. Bitte beachte, dass die Rolle der Administratoren und die Voraussetzungen, Administrator zu werden, von denen anderer Projekte abweichen können.
Wenn du die Hilfe eines Administrators brauchst, wende dich bitte an das Administrators' noticeboard.
Es gibt derzeit 174 Administratoren auf Commons.
Was ist ein Administrator?
| Administrators as of Februar 2026 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 174
If 174 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Technisch
Administratoren sind Benutzer mit folgenden Rechten:
- Bilder oder andere hochgeladene Dateien löschen und wiederherstellen bzw. gelöschte Versionen einsehen und wiederherstellen
- Seiten löschen und wiederherstellen bzw. gelöschte Versionen einsehen und wiederherstellen
- Seiten schützen und auch den Schutz wieder aufheben sowie geschützte Seiten bearbeiten
- Benutzer und IP-Adressen/IP-Adressbereiche sperren und entsperren
- Bearbeiten weniger eingeschränkter Oberflächenameldungen (siehe auch Commons:Oberflächenadministratoren)
- Dateien umbenennen
- Benutzer verschiedenen Gruppen hinzufügen und wieder daraus entfernen
- Upload Wizard-Kampagnen konfigurieren
- Einzelne Logbuch-Einträge sowie einzelne Versionen von Seiten löschen und wiederherstellen
- Seiten aus anderen Wikis importieren
- Versionsgeschichten von Seiten vereinen
- Missbrauchsfilter-Einstellungen bearbeiten
- Beim Verschieben die Erstellung einer Weiterleitung unterdrücken
- Die Benutzernamens-Ähnlichkeitsprüfung und die schwarze Liste unerwünschter Seiten- oder Benutzernamen außer Kraft setzen
- Gleichzeitig Nachrichten an mehrere Benutzer senden (massmessage)
- Höhere Limits in API-Abfragen
Diese Rechte sind allgemein als Administrationswerkzeuge bekannt.
Rolle in der Gemeinschaft
Administratoren sind erfahrene und vertrauenswürdige Mitglieder der Commons-Benutzerschaft, die zusätzliche Verwaltungsaufgaben übernommen haben und nach Konsens/Abstimmung mit den Administrationswerkzeugen ausgestattet wurden. Administratoren haben unterschiedliche Interessen- und Fachgebiete; typische Aufgaben eines Administrators sind die Bearbeitung und Erledigung von Löschanträgen, das Löschen von Urheberrechtsverletzungen, das Wiederherstellen von Dateien, das Schützen von Commons vor Vandalismus und die Bearbeitung von Vorlagen und anderen geschützten Seiten. Selbstverständlich können einige dieser Aufgaben auch von Benutzern ohne erweiterte Rechte erledigt werden.
Von Administratoren wird erwartet, dass sie die Ziele des Projekts verstehen und bereit sind, konstruktiv mit anderen auf diese Ziele hinzuarbeiten. Administratoren sollten außerdem Commons' Richtlinien verstehen und befolgen und gegebenenfalls den Konsens der Community befolgen.
Außerhalb von Rollen, die die Benutzung von Administrationswerkzeugen bedingen, haben Administratoren keine besondere redaktionelle Autorität durch ihre Position. In Diskussionen und Abstimmungen werden ihre Beiträge genauso behandelt wie die jedes anderen Benutzers. Einige Admins werden vielleicht einflussreicher, nicht aufgrund ihrer Position als solche, sondern aufgrund des persönlichen Vertrauens, das sie aus der Community gewonnen haben.
Vorschläge für Administratoren
Bitte lies Commons:Ratgeber zur Administratorentätigkeit.
Entzug von Adminrechten
Gemäß der Entzugs-Richtlinie können Adminrechte bei Inaktivität oder Missbrauch wieder entzogen werden. Bei einem Antrag zum Entzug von Adminrechten gelten die normalen Standards zur Ermittlung des Konsenses nicht. Stattdessen sollte der „Mehrheitskonsens“ verwendet werden, wobei ein Konsens von mehr als 50 % ausreicht, um den Admin abzuwählen.
Bewerbung als Administrator
Alle Benutzer, die Administratorenrechte erlangen möchten, müssen durch diesen Prozess gehen und eine Anfrage zu Administratorenrechten stellen, das schließt auch alle ehemaligen Administratoren ein, die ihre früheren Rechte wiedererlangen möchten.
Gehe als erstes auf Commons:Administrators/Howto und lies dir die Seite gründlich durch. Danach kannst du zurückkommen und im folgenden Abschnitt deine Kandidatur starten.
- Nachdem du auf den passenden Button geklickt und die Unterseite angelegt hast, kopiere den Link zur Unterseite, beispielsweise „Commons:Administrators/Requests/Benutzername“, bearbeite Commons:Administrators/Requests und füge ihn oben im entsprechenden Abschnitt ein. Danach umschließe ihn mit doppelten geschweiften Klammern (beispielsweise {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}), um die Unterseite einzubinden. Fordere eine Beobachtungslisten-Benachrichtigung unter MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice an, oder bearbeite MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice, um eine solche zu erstellen, wenn du Administrator bist.
- Wenn du von jemandem nominiert wurdest, akzeptiere bitte die Nominierung durch einen kurzen Kommentar und deine Signatur. Die Unterseite muss dann durch dich oder den Nominierenden entsprechend eingebunden werden.
| Ersetze in der folgenden Box Username durch deinen Benutzernamen: |
Abstimmung
Jeder registrierte Benutzer kann sich an der Abstimmung beteiligen. Wenn ein Benutzer bisher erst wenige oder gar keine Beiträge gemacht hat, könnte seine Stimme jedoch nicht vollständig gewichtet werden. Es ist gern gesehen, wenn die Gründe für unterstützende- oder ablehnende-Stimmen angegeben werden, da dies dem Bürokraten, der über den Antrag entscheidet, bei seiner Entscheidung hilft. Eine gute Begründung, bei Bedarf mit entsprechenden Nachweisen, kann stärker gewichtet werden als eine bloße Pro- oder Kontra-Stimme.
Damit der Antrag erfolgreich ist, werden normalerweise mindestens 75 % Zustimmung und mindestens 8 positive Stimmen erwartet. Allerdings hat der bearbeitende Bürokrat einen Spielraum bei der Einschätzung des Community-Konsens und die Entscheidung muss nicht ausschließlich auf bloßen Zahlen beruhen. Die Bürokraten können nach eigenem Ermessen die Dauer einer RfA verlängern, wenn sie der Meinung sind, dass dies für eine bessere Bestimmung des Konsenses in der Gemeinschaft hilfreich ist.
Neutrale Kommentare werden zur Ermittlung der prozentualen Pro-/Kontra-Ergebnisse nicht mitgezählt. Jedoch sind solche Kommentare Teil der Diskussion, können andere Diskussionsteilnehmer umstimmen und dem Bürokraten beim Verständnis des Community-Konsens behilflich sein.
Cache leeren Benutze den untenstehenden Bearbeiten-Link, um die eingebundene Seite zu bearbeiten.
Administratorkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Administrators/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Administratoren, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a unsuccessful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
This request ended on 3 February.--RoyZuo (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Taylor_49 (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · deleted uploads · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 00:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Having ca 20'000 edits at commons during past 9 years, most of them during last 2 years, I would like to help with the numberous backlogs of this wiki, among others ca 7'000 open requests for deletion, and ca 4000 category discussion requests. While some requests for deletion are extremely difficult, many are trivial and can be resolved by deletion after 7 days or even earlier due to obvious copyright violation or request of the uploader. Also many category discussion requests are trivial and need a speedy deletion only (example). I have been so far closing some deletion requests even without sysop status, limited to cases of obvious KEPT. meta.toolforge.org (very slow) While there are ca 170 human sysops on this wiki, of them ca 120 active ones, probably at least 40 more would be needed to stop the backlogs for further growing, and make them sink to a sane level, and I would like to be the first of 40 sysops appointed during th year 2026. Thank you. Taylor 49 (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Votes
Oppose per Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots', incivility below, and the other opposes below. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose mainly due to the false accusation below and not seeing how the given comment parts were "comments about the matter". --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below discussion. --Bedivere (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The below discussion contains a false accusation of edit warring, together with some other (possibly true) accusations of "lack of illegitimate sockpuppets", "only claims en-3" and similar stuff. And that fine discussion was started by a fine problem user blocked on several wikis, probably frustrated over the miserable failure of eir own RFA some time ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- so your manner to respond to questions and issues is by making up fallacies? Bedivere (talk) 02:06, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose. — ArtSmir (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Would you also ask in case of a Pro vote? How ever - please stop commenting other peoples votes in such a manner. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:02, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- @L. Beck: read the above comment by Marcus Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree Lukas Beck (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- It's a question of fairness ;-) Lukas Beck (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- Any participant who meets the minimum voting criteria is not required to justify their vote. — ArtSmir (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- please justify your vote Lukas Beck (talk) 12:27, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- I will
Abstain Incall talk 04:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC) - Neutral: better luck next time. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but I don't think the candidate is quite ready for the admin role as evidenced by the comments preceding this one, and the noticeboard discussion. Wolverine X-eye 17:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment There is no noticeboard discussion about me. Just a complaint (possibly false) that nobody has ever answered to. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per discussion below. Nothing seems to be going your way. Shaan SenguptaTalk 06:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)- Avoding the answers like Bedivere points out… doesn't give me much confidence. — regards, Revi 07:12, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per below. Nemoralis (talk) 15:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral because I don't want to pile on. Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)
- This RFA should probably be closed via Com:Snowball. Geoffroi 01:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Bad answer to Herby's questions. You confessed, that your userpage is not very accurate, but did not improve it. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment No major errors have been pointed. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment Please reveal what the "correct answer" would have been (after ca 10 "oppose" votes have already arrived) so that I can at least learn from my faults. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Your userpage states, that you are indefinitely blocked in eo.wiktionary. You were unblocked there more than 5 years ago. Correct would be to update your userpage. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Taivo! Herby talk thyme 10:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per the "miserable failure" comment above (in re. Bedivere's comment). This sort of petty sniping is entirely unbecoming of a prospective admin. Omphalographer (talk) 00:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Multiple blocks [1], regardless of when they happened, are not a relic, they're a serious concern for an admin candidate. Being combative, taking no responsibility for their actions, and shifting blame to others are further serious concerns. This user's complete refusal to address these concerns makes it very clear that they wouldn't make a good admin. Geoffroi 01:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- oh come on man.. i got multiple blocks too :(.. lets engage in commons contributions.... modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:41, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Support for motivation, hope you see your errors. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:42, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral i've not had bad impression of this user prior to this request.--RoyZuo (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. HurricaneZeta (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral While the candidate's active role in community maintenance is a positive, the discussion below reveals a failure to manage the conflict with others effectively. --0x0a (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Support: saw Jeff G's oppose; a reasonable behavioural report would have certainly garnered attention (which the one he provided didn't garner) and the TA incited a very reasonable response (response to diff) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:14, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
- how about Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 127#Edit warring by Taylor 49 (talk · contribs) asserting videos are 'screenshots'? good luck. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 03:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Modern primat: I've replaced the URL with discussion link since the link did not take me directly to the thread. This way it does. Feel free to revert if you think otherwise or if this doesn't work for you. Shaan SenguptaTalk 09:03, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- I did never do a personal attack or anything close to it and I see absolutely no reason to do so and am very aware that doing so is very problematic which is why I never do so. Will oppose based on this false accusation. And screenshots are not videos as a matter of fact and the thing you quoted is not an insult and was not intended to be anything of that sort; I was just confused why anybody would categorize a screenshot like that and then revert my correction so I added a little clarification that things should not be categorized in ways that are false, whatever the reasons for doing so are. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Acknowledging the ping, really nothing to say that I didn't say on the (2 removes) linked thread. - Jmabel ! talk 20:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ping to TP discussion participants, @Prototyperspective and @Jmabel. Let's see what they have to say. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:23, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- See User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" ... the linked accusation "Taylor 49 keeps edit warring" is obviously false, a look at the history reveals that I reverted only two times with 9 days between ... not really edit warring, after an insulting edit comment "please do not categorize things in ways that are clearly false" by user "Prototyperspective". Also in the following discussion User_talk:Prototyperspective#"ways_that_are_clearly_false" user "Prototyperspective" repeatedly posted personal comments bordering on personal attack instead of comments about the matter. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- An explanation is warranted I think. Bedivere (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment The user page User:Taylor 49 only claims en-3. Glrx (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Oops, I misunderstood. 0x0a (talk) 12:01, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- I brought up en-3 because parts of the debate could involve misunderstandings due to language. The meaning of "screenshot" and whether a post was a personal attack. I did not intend to imply that Taylor 49's English was inadequate or a reason to oppose Taylor 49's RfA. Glrx (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- en-3 is common among administrators who are non-native English speakers. 0x0a (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Colour me puzzled but why does your user page appear to suggest that you are "permanently blocked" on eo Wiktionary when your global account doesn't seem to bear that out? Herby talk thyme 15:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- @User:Herbythyme Thank you for that question. This is a relict from 6 years ago. Taylor 49 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- Lower on the page, where they list "socks", it says, under "illegitimate", "none found so far". In their table of blocks, next to sv.wiki, it says "not yet". This is some very bizarre stuff to go along with the eo.wiktionary detail. Geoffroi 01:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Who the hell are you? I cannot find a single useful contribution of you at this wiki or any other wiki. Why did you post this comment? Are you maybe one of the registered users who commented and voted here, and deliberately logged out for the purpose of making this silly comment under the protection of those recently activated temporary accounts? Taylor 49 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- Personal attack removed by Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk · contribs) at 11:08, 6 February 2026 (UTC) ~2026-70906-4 (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Very unclear what to "address" and how. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- Funny that you point out your gender choice or preference (which is acceptable) but decide not to address the issues pointed out above. Definitely not admin material. Bedivere (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Do you have any pronouns you would like to share? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Note, the candidate chose to answer on my user talk page in Special:Diff/1159437397, rather than here. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:21, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- My apologies. I've corrected my comment. Geoffroi 04:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Geoffroi. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:53, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please do not refer to me as male. Taylor 49 (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Bürokratenkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Bürokraten, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
No current requests.
CheckUserkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Checkusers/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Checkuser, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
No current requests.
Oversightkandidatur starten
Wenn die Anfragen erledigt sind, sollten die hier aufgelisteten Seiten in Commons:Oversighters/Archive archiviert werden.
- Bitte lies Commons:Oversighter, bevor Du hier postest oder abstimmst. Jeder angemeldete Benutzer kann wählen, wobei diejenigen, die wenige oder keine vorherigen Bearbeitungen haben, möglicherweise nicht vollständig gezählt werden.
No current requests.
Aufgaben